tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734285844676849369.post4424755526928484677..comments2023-10-07T08:55:52.754-07:00Comments on #REDEYETAXI: The Civil War Was About SlaveryUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734285844676849369.post-65865189865784932772017-01-16T07:57:03.860-08:002017-01-16T07:57:03.860-08:00PART 3
Between the Jews and the Gentiles -- In th...PART 3<br /><br />Between the Jews and the Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought<br />R' Bar-Chayim's arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R' Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the "Conclusion" of his article: <br />"It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d's word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce 'compromises' or 'renovations' into it."<br />On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet -- as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d -- are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.<br />In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R' Bar-Chayim's article, <br />"Between Jews and Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought," because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written: <br />"And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like -- most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah" (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05730506332750865720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734285844676849369.post-68336758190610093462017-01-16T07:56:17.142-08:002017-01-16T07:56:17.142-08:00PART 2
Laws in regard to murder, which clearly sta...PART 2<br />Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime). <br />A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile. <br />A Jew's exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile's property. But if a Gentile's property causes damage to a Jew's property, the Gentile is liable. <br />The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah's law or only by a Rabbinic decree. <br />A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one's sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him. <br />The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed. <br />One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt. <br />A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death. <br />One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid. <br />A Gentile -- or even a convert to Judaism -- may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister). <br />One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine. <br />The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile. <br />One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment "love your neighbour" applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles. <br />One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: "Your mother shall be greatly ashamed..." <br />Gentiles are likened to animals. <br />If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass. <br />The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure -- he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body. <br />One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals. <br />An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile's ritual slaughter -- but this is not the place to delve into the subject). <br />Their members (genitals) are like those of asses" -- Gentiles are likened to animals. <br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05730506332750865720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3734285844676849369.post-51297229681145908722017-01-16T07:54:34.416-08:002017-01-16T07:54:34.416-08:00Hi,
The biggest mistake that most people today mak...Hi,<br />The biggest mistake that most people today make, when arguing about False Flags, is that their "canvas" is too small.<br />Genesis chapter 3 is a False Flag!<br />You must invert the myth to see the truth!<br />The true God is the Snake and the Fruit, is Knowledge.<br />They (elohim aka Elite) want us ignorant, like those in Animal Farm.<br />The first Protocol of the Elders of Zion can be found in Genesis chapter 47. Read it without your ecclesiastical glasses and you will see the modus operandi, which Jews have used for 3000 years.<br />Remember!<br />Judaism is the Theology of Racism and Christianity and Islam are a continuation of it.<br />Jesus is supposed to be the Son of Yahweh, the genocidal God of the Jews. All one need do is read TORAH, the first 5 books of the Jewish Bible, to see this monster in action. The Gospel is a False Flag. Without a true knowledge of the racist TORAH, you would be fooled into accepting the Son of Yahweh, as a Prince of Peace.<br />Likewise with Islam. It was Arabian Jews who created Islam:<br /><br />(Be sure to Google this article:<br />HISTORY OF PALESTINE<br />614-1096 C.E.<br />From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.<br />By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850<br /><br />Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, aka Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik. Abu Bakr, became the first Caliph, and was in fact son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, who perceiving a dreadful predicament, sent Rabbi Shallum to Mahomed, and told him to offer his submission, friendship, and services, and endeavour to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted Rabbi Shallum’s proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, Aisha, a handsome young child, for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:<br /><br />The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.<br /><br />Google: The JEWel wasp and the Cockroach.<br />You will see a perfect analogy of the Jew and the Goy!<br />GENTILES IN HALACHA<br />Foreword -- Daat Emet<br />In this article R' Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards "Gentiles" in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion: <br />"The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as 'man,' and a Gentile." <br />That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R' Bar-Chayim's work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R' Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs NOT on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.<br />For the English readers' convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R' Bar-Chayim's article:<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05730506332750865720noreply@blogger.com